AdvocateWeb - Helping Overcome Professional Exploitation - Sexual Exploitation of Clients
AdvocateWeb - Helping Overcome Professional Exploitation - Sexual Exploitation of Clients
 Home > Survivors Coffee House > Humor
Donate Now

  Login
  Community
  What's New?

Subscribe to
our eNewsletter
Search
  Disclaimer
  Home
   Exploitation
   Tell Me More
   Cost of Abuse
   I Need Help!
  Featured Items
  Site Directory
  Information
   Articles
   Books
   Find Attorney
   Law & Ethics
   Organizations
   Advocates
   Mental Health
   Spiritual Help
   Family
   Disabilities
   Conferences
   Research
  Coffee House
   Art & Poetry
   Quotes
   Humor
   Speak Out!
   Email Lists
   Forum
   Chat
   Guest Book
  About AW
  The Team
   Donate
   Endorsements
   Contact Us
  Products

 

 

There is nothing funny about sexual exploitation.   Nevertheless, we decided to create this page for you to share something humorous.

 


Bricklayer's Accident Report

[contributed by a reader]

Accident Report
This is a bricklayer's accident report that was printed in the   newsletter of the English equivalent of the Workers' Compensation Board.  So here, thanks to John Sedgwick, is this Bricklayer's report.

Dear Sir; 

I am writing in response to your request for additional information in  Block #3 of the accident reporting form. I put "Poor Planning" as the  cause of my accident. You asked for a fuller explanation and I trust  the following details will be sufficient.   I am a bricklayer by trade. On the day of the accident, I was working  alone on the roof of a new six-story building. When I completed my   work, I found I had some bricks left over which when weighed later  were found to weigh 240 lbs. Rather than carry the bricks down by  hand, I decided to lower them in a barrel by using a pulley which was  attached to the side of the building at the sixth floor.   Securing the rope at ground level, I went up to the roof, swung the  barrel out and loaded the bricks into it. Then I went down and untied  the rope, holding it tightly to insure a slow descent of the 240 lbs  of bricks. You will note on the accident reporting form that my weight  is 135 lbs.   Due to my surprise at being jerked off the ground so suddenly, I lost  my presence of mind and forgot to let go of the rope. Needless to say,  I proceeded at a rapid rate up the side of the building.   In the vicinity of the third floor, I met the barrel which was now  proceeding downward at an equally impressive speed. This explains the   fractured skull, minor abrasions and the broken collarbone, as listed  in Section 3, accident reporting form.   Slowed only slightly, I continued my rapid ascent, not stopping until  the fingers of my right hand were two knuckles deep into the pulley  which I mentioned in Paragraph 2 of this correspondence. Fortunately   by this time I had regained my presence of mind and was able to hold  tightly to the rope, in spite of the excruciating pain I was now  beginning to experience.    At approximately the same time, however, the barrel of bricks hit the   ground-and the bottom fell out of the barrel. Now devoid of the weight  of the bricks, the barrel weighed approximately 50 lbs.   I refer you again to my weight. As you might imagine, I began a rapid  descent down the side of the building. In the vicinity of the third  floor, I met the barrel coming up. This accounts for the two fractured  ankles, broken tooth and severe lacerations of my legs and lower body.    Here my luck began to change slightly. The encounter with the barrel  seemed to slow me enough to lessen my injuries when I fell into the   pile of bricks and fortunately only three vertebrae were cracked.   I am sorry to report, however, as I lay there on the pile of bricks,  in pain, unable to move and watching the empty barrel six stories  above me, I again lost my composure and presence of mind and let go of  the rope.


Backyard Dig

[contributed by a reader]

The story behind the letter below is that there evidently is a person in Rhode Island who digs things out of his backyard and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling them with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archaeological finds. This guy really exists and does this in his spare time. Here's an actual response from the Smithsonian Institution. Nice to know they're on top of this stuff.


Smithsonian Institute
207 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20078


Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull." We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago.  Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be "Malibu Barbie." It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings.

However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:

1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically  fossilized bone.

2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-
homonids.

3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that:

  A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has  chewed on.

  B. Clams don't have teeth.

It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to 1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results.

Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino. Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin.

However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.

Yours in Science,
Chief Curator-Antiquities


You Know You Drink Too Much Coffee When...
source unknown

  • You speed walk in your sleep.

  • You answer the door before people knock.

  • You sleep with your eyes open.

  • You just completed another sweater and you don't know how to knit.

  • You ski uphill.

  • You grind your coffee beans in your mouth.

  • You have to watch videos in fast-forward.

  • The only time you're standing still is in an earthquake.

  • Your eyes stay open when you sneeze.

  • You can type sixty words a minute with your feet.

  • All Your kids are named "Joe."

  • You Don't need a hammer to pound nails.

  • Juan Valdez named his donkey after you.

  • Your only source of nutrition comes from Sweet n Low.

  • You don't sweat, you percolate.

  • You've worn out the handles on your favorite mug.

  • People get dizzy just watching you.

  • When someone asks you, "How are you?", you say, "Good to the last drop."

  • Your birthday is a national holiday in Brazil.

  • You go to sleep just so you can wake up and smell the coffee.

  • You can outlast the Energizer Bunny.

  • You don't even wait for the water to boil anymore.

  • You don't get mad, you get steamed.

  • You think CPR stands for "Coffee Provides Resuscitation.


Questions Asked in Courtrooms
source unknown

  • "Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?"

  • "The youngest son, the twenty-year old, how old is he?"

  • "Were you present when your picture was taken?"

  • Q: "Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?"
    A: "No."
    Q: "Did you check for blood pressure?"
    A: "No."
    Q: "Did you check for breathing?"
    A: "No."
    Q: "So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?"
    A: "No."
    Q: "How can you be so sure, Doctor?"
    A: "Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar."
    Q: "But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?"
    A: "It is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere."

  • "Was it you or your younger brother who was killed in the war?"

  • "Did he kill you?"

  • "How far apart were the vehicles at the time of the collision?"

  • "You were there until the time you left, is that true?"

  • "How many times have you committed suicide?"

  • Q: "So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?"
    A: "Yes."
    Q: "And what were you doing at that time?"

  • Q: "She had three children, right?"
    A: "Yes."
    Q: "How many were boys?"
    A: "None."
    Q: "Were there any girls?"

  • Q: "You say the stairs went down to the basement?"
    A: "Yes."
    Q: "And these stairs, did they go up also?"

  • Q: "Mr. Slatery, you went on a rather elaborate honeymoon, didn't you?"
    A: "I went to Europe, Sir."
    Q: "And you took your new wife?"

  • Q: "How was your first marriage terminated?"
    A: "By death."
    Q: "And by who's death was it terminated?"

  • Q: "Can you describe the individual?"
    A: "He was about medium height and had a beard."
    Q: "Was this a male, or a female?"

  • Q: "Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?"
    A: "No, this is how I dress when I go to work."

  • Q: "Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?"
    A: "All my autopsies are performed on dead people."

  • Q: "All your responses must be oral, OK? What school did you go to?"
    A: "Oral."

  • Q: "Do you recall the time that you examined the body?"
    A: "The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.."
    Q: "And Mr. Dennington was dead at the time?"
    A: "No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy."

  • Q: "You were not shot in the fracas?"
    A: "No, I was shot midway between the fracas and the navel."

  • Q: "Are you qualified to give a urine sample?"
    A: "I have been since early childhood."


A "Senior Moment" ...

Two elderly ladies had been friends for many decades. Over the years they had shared all kinds of activities and adventures. Lately, their activities had been limited to meeting a few times a week to play cards. One day they were playing cards when one looked at the other and said, "Now don't get mad at me.....I know we've been friends for a long time.....but I just can't think of your name! I've thought and thought, but I can't remember it. Please tell me what your name is." Her friend glared at her. For at least three minutes she just stared and glared at her. Finally she said, "How soon do you need to know?


[Send us your favorite humor!]

 

Home ] Poetry & Art ] Quotes ] [ Humor ] Speak Out! ] Guest Book ] E-Mail Discussion Lists ] Chat ] Web Discussion Forum ]

 

Website design and development was generously donated by You2Web
You2Web - Web Design and Development

This site is best viewed using Netscape Navigator 4.0  
or Internet Explorer 4.0 or above.

Copyright © 1998-2004 AdvocateWeb.  All rights reserved.  Other copyrights may also apply for specific pages.  AdvocateWeb does not warrant the information on this website, nor at other linked sites, and listing of such information on AdvocateWeb is not necessarily an endorsement.  Your use of this web site constitutes your understanding and acceptance of the full terms and conditions set forth in our disclaimer and is your agreement to hold AdvocateWeb harmless in all circumstances.  Attention webmasters: we are a "link friendly" site.  Do you have any suggestions, comments, corrections, other URL links, or submissions for this Web site? We would love to hear from you!  Click here or send email to webmaster@advocateweb.org.  If you have complaints about AdvocateWeb regarding public postings in our Forums or Guestbook, or regarding any of our staff or volunteers, contact abuse@advocateweb.org.